Poor Newt, says Sarah, "the establishment" and "the liberal media" and "certainly ... the progressives and the Democrats don’t like" him.
A 3:1 dislike from the center-left. So whose dislike does Sarah cite as representative of all that liberally lopsided and very unpleasant unfairness? Why, former Reagan speechwriter and WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan, of course, who once paused from her Lady Astor routine just long enough to label Mr. Gingrich an "angry little attack muffin."
In Sarah's characteristically stirring tone, and delivered, naturally, with her usual poetic mellifluousness, as well as with keen attention to precision in language, she added:
I’ll articulate that it is hypocritical of the media to subscribe to one candidate and not another, that kind of angry attack muffin verbiage, to one and not the other.
In case you missed it, that would be, to one and not the other. And we assume she meant "ascribe"? Other than that, that, there, is what she articulated, all right.
Prior to singling out Noonan as a typical voice of our liberally twisted, Gingrich-disliking media society, Sarah had also selected one of this nation's favorite Saul Alinsky-like pols, Chris Christie, to criticize for having criticized Newt. It seems the former had got his "panties in a wad."
With all the actual liberals and real Democrats and orthodox progressives out there -- all of them eagerly awaiting another Palin bombardment -- couldn't Sarah, maybe, pick on one of them?
Or could it be that Sarah wishes to concentrate her fire on the GOP establishment only, because she envisions herself, someday soon, as a Tea Party, third-party reigning queen?