This may seem a bit silly, but it sounds about right. Having earlier predicted a 270-268 squeaker,
[a] Moody's Analytics election model now predicts a Democratic electoral landslide in the 2016 presidential vote…. [It] gives the incumbent party 326 electoral votes to the Republican challenger's 212 … regardless of who wins either party's nomination.
Three years ago, Obama beat Romney 332 to 206. Since then, Republicans have labored to lock in, if not expand, their electoral disadvantages. Is there any demographic other than beer-stained bubbas they have not insulted or otherwise alienated in their post-Priebusian-autopsy era?
Note: If my incessant predictions of a no-worries presidential campaign seem hubristic, I nonetheless have nothing on Moody's, whose "economic forecasts … determine what the world will look like in November 2016."