How would you like this imbecile representing you in the United States Senate? Politico:
"Rep. Kevin Cramer, the Republican nominee for Senate in North Dakota, questioned whether the allegation of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be disqualifying for his Supreme Court nomination even if it were true.
"In an interview with a local TV station, Cramer said if Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her three decades ago were true, it would be 'unfortunate' and 'terrible,' but should be weighed against his life and judicial record since that time."
Yes, a trifle unfortunate.
Still, others have made the argument that Kavanaugh's professional record more than compensates for his youthful … indiscretion? There, Cramer is not that unique — which is also "unfortunate." But take a look at the congressman's stated reasoning as to why Kavanaugh's particular, teenage actions were rather innocuous:
"There was no type of intercourse or anything like that," he said. "Nothing happened in terms of a sexual event, beyond, obviously, the attack."
Emphasis mine. Imbecility his.